so i am in that position i always find myself before going on vacation: trying to get work done, trying to plan a perfect wardrobe (that never goes well), and trying to also do a thousand things that start out with the following prefix: “wouldn’t it be great if before we go . . . “
i will say this: for the last-minute vacation sewing, a good jersey is your friend. i’ve been up for two hours this morning and i’ve framed out a dress and a skirt; all they need now is elastic and some hemming. even if that’s all i get done, it’s done a lot to ease my nagging anxiety about packing light but broadly and planning for a far more tropical climate.
one other thing that must be added to the weekend to-do list: cutting the cat’s claws. she’s on my lap right now, in an ecstasy of purring and rubbing (she loves it when i’m home working, i do so much sitting it’s like she can cram a week’s worth of laptime into one morning) and i know my thighs are going to be covered in pinpricks when i finally stand up.
on a side note: adj was back in alameda on friday and saw a kitty we once helped across the street. as it danced around him on dainty kitty-sized paws he finally, truly realized: yes, killie’s feet are enormous. good thing she’s such a hottie everywhere else, it distracts people from her clodhoppers.
ten days, we’ll be back in mexico. very much looking forward to seeing more of this country, and determined this time to finish writing about it. writing that last bit about yelapa last year is still on my to-do list; i think i should start dating some of the items on the list, just so i can laugh at how long it takes me to finish things.
———————————————-+
as for goodbyes. i saw this morning, though i think it got announced yesterday, that triquarterly review is closing its print edition and becoming some sort of student-run web journal thingamabobby. the scuttlebutt is that the university librarians basically decided that literary journals are dead and the most valuable forum for lit now is the open source web site.
this is pretty awful, for a lot of reasons. triquarterly has been around for decades–their last issue is their 45th anniversary i believe. they’ve printed some of the leading lights of letters when their careers were both nascent and at their peak. i’m not sure yet another web journal will be able to match that tradition.
i’m very torn about the print versus electronic book debate in general, but i have a real problem with the web journal thing. there are a freakin’ lot of them, and some of them post very good work, and some of them provide a valuable service in getting first-time writers out into public view. but to decide that these most fluid, open-source sites are the future of letters seems foolishly hopeful. i am all for democratizing information, but in such a way that we are raised up collectively, not flooded with a morass of short, mediocre works. it is remarkably hard to comfortably read something longer than 2000 words on a website, and there have always been more would-be writers than readers out there.
i am also just incredibly disappointed in the university and the uni librarians. the budget for a journal is a very small thing, and it serves the function of marketing as well as promoting the cultural development of a community, which is a part of a university’s mandate–one that they seem very eager to forget these days. as for the librarians, what gives? are they so eager to dump everything online and work in a sea of terminals? i always thought of the librarian as the conservative protector of information, quick to point out the pitfalls of electronic display and archiving, eager to point students to the best ideas housed in their domain. to dump a forum for literature into the laps of a few students with programming knowledge seems a blatant abdication of responsibility to the intellectual welfare of the students they are supposed to serve.
my .02. now i have to go proof more of that stinkin’ book.